1º Programa de TV da Dilma (19/08): emoção, propostas, verdades que não saem no Jornal Nacional - Compartilhe!

Uma imagem mostra evolução da inflação de 94 a 2013 (descontrole era com FHC) - Muda mais

Campanha de Dilma apresenta informações para debate político - Portal Vermelho

Campanha de Dilma apresenta informações para debate político - Portal Vermelho
A presidenta Dilma Rousseff já deu o tom da disputa eleitoral em 2014: “A verdade vai vencer o pessimismo. O que vence o pessimismo é a verdade de fato, e isso nós estamos mostrando e falando”. E para que a verdade chegue a todos a Campanha Dilma Rousseff indica alguns caminhos na internet que podem ajudar a enriquecer o debate político, acrescentando informações às discussões.

Diferentes caminhos apresentam informações de fontes confiáveis. No portal da Campanha Dilma Rousseff encontram-se as principais propostas, dados de seu governo, gráficos para compartilhamento, além de links para acompanhamento ao vivo das agendas da candidata.

Voltado à publicação de conteúdo jornalístico – textos, fotos, vídeos, áudios e documentos –, o site Sala de Imprensa traz o passo a passo da candidata Dilma Rousseff. O site acompanha o cotidiano da candidata e suas atividades eleitorais, além de trazer dados e balanços das ações do governo Dilma.

Site apoiador, o Muda Mais tem um tom mais leve e jovial, mas não menos sério e relevante, no tratamento das informações. O site oferece material relevante, como gráficos e resumos informativos, de fácil compartilhamento em redes sociais. Outra parte importante de sua atuação está em desmentir dados equivocados massificados pela mídia.

Redes sociais

Nas redes sociais também há boas fontes de informação e material pronto para compartilhamento. Os caminhos para as páginas do Facebook são espelhos dos sites da campanha, e têm como referência principal os perfis de Dilma Rousseff . E também há perfis vinculados a sites apoiadores, como o do PT e o Muda Mais

Os perfis também estão presentes no Twitter. A presidenta Dilma Rousseff publica informações sobre sua agenda, atividades da campanha, informações sobre programas e ações do Governo Federal e mensagens presidenciais. Também é possível acompanhar a campanha de Dilma Rousseff pelo Google Plus.

Multimídia

A internet também está recheada de material multimídia sobre a campanha de Dilma, nos formatos de imagens, áudio e vídeo, com reportagens e entrevistas. A rotina de Dilma Rousseff, tanto nas atividades da Presidência quanto nas atividades de campanha, tem farto material disponível no perfil da presidenta e na Sala de Imprensa da campanha.

Os materiais em vídeo estão publicados em canais do Youtube. No perfil da campanha de Dilma Rousseff (https://www.youtube.com/dilma13presidenta) podem ser encontrados entrevistas, coberturas de eventos, agendas de campanha e vídeos para compartilhamento. Já a página do Muda Mais apresenta vídeos de apoiadores, material de divulgação e animação com dados, tudo também disponível para compartilhamento.

Quem tem interesse em arquivos de áudio, para uso ou compartilhamento, pode também acessar o material produzido na Sala de Imprensa da Campanha de Dilma Rousseff (https://soundcloud.com/sala-de-imprensa-dilma13), onde encontram-se entrevistas, matérias sobre a cobertura da campanha e com dados sobre o desempenho do governo da presidenta Dilma. Outra fonte de áudios para informação e compartilhamento é o Muda Mais, que apresenta entrevistas, discursos e áudios de apoiadores de Dilma Rousseff.

Da Redação em Brasília
Com informações da Assessoria da Candidata

Israel reinicia agressão contra Faixa de Gaza - Portal Vermelho

Israel reinicia agressão contra Faixa de Gaza - Portal Vermelho
O regime de Israel reiniciou o ataque contra a sitiada Faixa de Gaza na manhã desta terça-feira (19). Segundo meios palestinos, o regime de Telavive lançou um ataque contra 10 localidades no enclave.



Blindados de fabricação americana reiniciaram genocídio na Faixa de Gaza


Aviões israelenses bombardearam áreas de cultivo em Beduina (norte) e outras duas partes do bairro de Zeitoun e no leste de Khan Iunis. Barcos israelenses também dispararam contra a costa de Gaza.

Segundo fontes palestinas, duas crianças palestinas do bairro de Rafah foram feridas nos ataques, que também tiveram a participação de blindados por terra.

A nova agressão começou depois que o premiê Benjamin Netanyahu ordenou o exército a atacar o enclave, após ter conhecimento de relatórios feitos por fontes israelenses de que três foguetes teriam sido lançados contra territórios ocupados.

Em seguida, Netanyahu ordenou a saída de forma unilateral da delegação israelita que mantinha uma conversação indireta com palestinos na cidade do Cairo, no Egito, sobre uma extensão da trégua acertada há dez dias.

Em resposta, o porta-voz do Movimento de Resistência Islâmica (Hamas) da Palestina, Sami Abu Zuhri, repudiou as alegações sobre os disparos de foguetes caseiros a partir de Gaza e assegurou que tais afirmações "não têm base sólida".

"Não tenho nenhuma informação sobre lançamento de foguetes a partir de Gaza. Os ataque israelenses têm como finalidade sabotar as negociações aqui na cidade do Cairo", agregou o porta-voz.

Horas antes, na mesma jornada, o porta-voz do Hamas havia informado que o regime israelense estava criando obstáculos nas negociações e estava levando as conversas para o que chamou de "beco sem saída".

Há 43 dias o regime de Telavive deu início à mais uma agressão contra a Faixa de Gaza, que resultou no assassinato de 2016 palestinos, dentre eles 516 crianças. Além destes assassinatos, 10.195 pessoas foram feridas, dentre elas 3.084 menores de idade.

Com informações da HispanTV.

Sob vaias, candidato Alckmin visita obras do metrô em São Paulo - Portal Vermelho

Sob vaias, candidato tucano visita obras do metrô em São Paulo - Portal Vermelho
Durante uma vistoria às obras da estação de metro da Barra Funda, na zona oeste da capital paulista, nesta terça-feira (19), o governador de São Paulo, Geraldo Alckmin (PSDB) foi vaiado pelo público presente. Além das vaias, os transeuntes gritaram frases como "Eu estou com sede" e "Está faltando água", em referência à crise de abastecimento hídrico no estado.




Geraldo Alckmin esteve na estação Palmeiras-Barra Funda de metrô. Foto: Renata de Oliveira Silva / vc repórter/Portal Terra O candidato tucano à reeleição também recebeu xingamentos e críticas ao seu governo. Reclamações como "Diminui o preço da tarifa" e "Melhora a saúde e o metrô" também foram dirigidas a Alckmin.

O candidato do PSDB esteve na Estação Palmeiras Barra-Funda para anunciar o “Cartão Bom”, que foi anunciado em 2011, mas começará a ser usado no dia 30 de agosto, segundo ele. Em relação à expansão do metrô e CPTM, o candidato tucano afirmou que entregará, ainda neste ano, quatro estações que estão com as obras bastante atrasadas.

“Vamos entregar duas estações se não em agosto em setembro. Uma é a Vila Prudente e a outra e a Oratório (ambas do monotrilho). Vamos entregar a estação Fradique Coutinho e em seguida Oscar Freire (ambas de bairros nobres da cidade). Alckmin preferiu não prometer mais quilômetros de metrô e trens, mas disse que o transporte sobre trilhos está em plena expansão.

Ao ser questionado sobre as vaias, o governador disse não ter se ofendido. "Primeiro, queria destacar aqui que hoje foi o recorde de selfies, de fotografias".

Uma passageira que estava perto do tucano tentou conversar com ele sobre a falta de água em sua casa. Segundo ela, já existe racionamento onde vive. Alckmin, no entanto, não parou para conversar com a jovem.

Com agências

Dilma, Coração Valente!!! Jingle oficial da Campanha

UJS: Verdades sobre o Bolsa Família

Lindo desenho sobre a esperança Palestina

Marah FM - Hebron - Palestina

ONU classifica como ‘desumano’ e ‘cruel’ confinamento solitário de crianças palestinas por Israel - ONU Brasil

20/07/2014
ONU Brasil

Relator especial denuncia tratamento ‘degradante’ e ‘ilegal’, enquanto Comitê Especial sobre o tema declarou estar ‘perturbado’ com relatos de prisão em massa de crianças e destruição rotineira de casas de povo palestino, entre outras práticas.

O Relator Especial das Nações Unidas sobre a situação dos direitos humanos nos territórios palestinos ocupados, Richard Falk, condenou nesta sexta-feira (20) o uso por Israel de solitárias para crianças palestinas. O Especialista, em seu relatório (acesse aqui), pediu ao governo israelense que trate as crianças palestinas detidas de acordo com as leis internacionais de direitos humanos, respeitando sua dignidade.
“O uso por Israel de confinamento solitário contra crianças viola flagrantemente os padrões internacionais de direitos humanos”, indignou-se Falk sobre o fato do país aplicar a medida como punição para crianças em greve de fome.
“Este padrão de abuso de Israel é grave”, avalia. “É desumano, cruel, degradante e ilegal, e mais preocupante, é provável que afete a saúde física e mental de detidos menores de idade.”
“As condições carcerárias são geralmente deploráveis, obrigando as crianças a dormirem no chão ou em camas de concreto em celas sem janelas”, afirma Falk. “Às crianças palestinas, especialmente de Gaza, também são negadas visitas de parentes e acesso a advogados. Isto isola e intimida as crianças e as expõem a maus-tratos durante interrogatórios.”
Falk destacou que, em 53 casos relatados pela ONG ‘Defence for Children International’ desde 2008, palestinos entre 15 e 17 anos foram confinados em solitárias por períodos de 1 a 24 dias.

Comitê da ONU relata momentos de terror que fazem parte do cotidiano dos palestinos

Também nesta sexta-feira (20), o Comitê Especial da ONU sobre práticas israelenses nos Territórios Ocupados expressou grave preocupação com o tratamento de crianças palestinas detidas pelas forças de segurança israelenses, advertindo que um padrão de detenção e maus tratos das crianças “está vinculado a preocupações mais amplas e de longa data sobre a detenção palestinos por Israel em geral”.
“Testemunhas informaram à Comissão que maus tratos de crianças palestinas começam desde o momento da detenção”, disse o Embaixador Palitha T.B. Kohona, Representante Permanente do Sri Lanka junto às Nações Unidas em Nova York e Presidente da Comissão, no final de uma visita de averiguação em Amã (Jordânia), Cairo (Egito) e na Faixa de Gaza.
“Um grande número de pessoas são rotineiramente detidas. Casas com crianças são cercadas por soldados israelenses durante a madrugada, granadas de som são disparadas em direção às casas, portas são quebradas, tiros muitas vezes são disparados, nenhum mandado é apresentado”, observou ele. “As crianças são brutalmente presas, seus olhos vendados e são empurradas para as traseiras dos veículos militares.”
O Embaixador Kohona explicou que os pais não estão autorizados por Israel a acompanhar as crianças detidas, e que os membros da família são insultados, intimidados e, por vezes, agredidos fisicamente. De acordo com testemunhas, a detenção e transferência de crianças pode durar horas, e muitas vezes, podem incluir paradas em assentamentos israelenses, postos de fiscalização e policiais ou bases militares de Israel.
“As crianças não são informados dos seus direitos, incluindo o direito à representação legal e não autoincriminação”, alertou. Em 63% dos casos envolvendo crianças palestinas, segundo os relatos recebidos, as autoridades israelenses tentam pressioná-las a se tornarem informantes. “A visão do Comitê é de que esta é uma prática inaceitável, com a qual Israel deve pôr fim imediatamente.”
“Relatórios do interrogatório de crianças palestinas são de extrema preocupação para a Comissão, bem como as condições de detenção em geral”, salientou o Embaixador Kohona. “Às crianças palestinas detidas, são frequentemente negadas visitas de familiares, o acesso a representação legal, além de serem mantidas em celas com adultos, negado o acesso à educação e, mesmo com a idade de 12 anos, julgadas em tribunais militares israelenses”.
“Ficamos consternados ao ouvir que Israel continua a sua prática de condenar crianças à prisão, ou a prisão domiciliar em outras casas diferentes das suas próprias famílias, com efeito exilando-as de suas famílias”, disse ele. A Comissão foi informada por testemunhas que havia 192 crianças em detenção – 39 delas com menos de 16 anos.
O Comitê também ficou chocado ao saber que Israel põe crianças palestinas em confinamento solitário. “Segundo relatos recebidos, Israel usa a solitária contra 12% das crianças palestinas detidas”, observou o Embaixador Kohona. “Isto é especialmente preocupante quando se considera que Israel prende cerca de 500 a 700 crianças palestinas todos os anos.”
Nas suas observações preliminares, o Comitê Especial da ONU chamou a atenção para duas outras áreas de preocupação imediata na Cisjordânia, incluindo Jerusalém Oriental: a prática israelense de demolir casas palestinas e a violência de colonos israelenses contra palestinos. Os especialistas também avaliaram o impacto econômico do bloqueio israelense à Faixa de Gaza.
“Estas práticas israelenses levam o Comitê Especial a uma conclusão abrangente e profundamente perturbadora”, ressaltou Kohona. “A prisão em massa de palestinos; a demolição rotineira de casas e o deslocamento de palestinos; a violência generalizada por colonos israelenses contra palestinos; e o bloqueio e a dependência resultante sobre o contrabando ilegal para sobreviver; estas práticas equivalem a uma estratégia para forçar a retirada do povo palestino de suas terras ou marginalizá-los severamente de modo a estabelecer e manter um sistema de opressão permanente.”
O Comitê Especial vai apresentar um relatório de missão para a Assembleia Geral da ONU em novembro próximo, com suas observações e recomendações para melhorar a situação dos direitos humanos para aqueles cujas vidas são afetadas pela ocupação.

Comissão da Verdade UFBA - 9ª Oitiva: Maria Liege Rocha

Maria Liege Rocha, ex-aluna de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, ativista do movimento feminino pela Anistia e ex-presidente da União de Mulheres de Salvador, depôs na nona oitiva da Comissão Milton Santos de Memória e Verdade da UFBA, realizada no dia 22 abril de 2014, no auditório da Faculdade de Comunicação.

No Dia dos Pais, Dino é atacado por morte do filho - Brasil 247

Brasil 247

 Na maior baixaria da campanha eleitoral até agora, perfis fakes no Twitter que apoiam o candidato Edison Lobão Filho, do PMDB, atacam o rival Flavio Dino, do PC do B, pela morte do filho, vítima de erro médico em Brasília; o candidato comunista recebeu mais de uma dezena de felicitações que trazia o seguinte texto: "Feliz Dia dos... #SQN"; "Desde a manhã, os fakes de Edinho Lobão me dirigem mensagens agressivas em pleno dia dos pais. Esse tipo de "gente" só tem maldade na alma. Fazem alusão à trágica morte do meu filho para tentar me intimidar e desestabilizar emocionalmente. "Gente" baixa", rebateu Dino

10 de Agosto de 2014 às 15:39

247 - A disputa eleitoral pelo governo do Estado do Maranhão vai ganhando contornos pouco civilizados. Neste domingo (10), Dia dos Pais, perfis fakes no Twitter, que declaram apoio à candidatura de Edison Lobão Filho (PMDB), enviaram mensagens ironizando o candidato Flávio Dino (PC do B), que perdeu um de seu filhos há dois anos, vítima de negligência médica. "Feliz Dia dos... #SQN" é o texto central de mais de uma dezena de tweets que Dino recebeu. Diante do fato, o candidato a governador pelo PC do B criticou a atitude de péssimo gosto.
"Desde a manhã, os fakes de Edinho Lobão me dirigem mensagens agressivas em pleno dia dos pais. Esse tipo de "gente" so tem maldade na alma. Retuitei algumas das mensagens, para que todos possam ver para crer. Esse tipo de "gente" que nós estamos enfrentando. E vamos vencer. Fazem alusão à trágica morte do meu filho para tentar me intimidar e desestabilizar emocionalmente. "Gente" baixa", afirmou Dino.
O candidato do PC do B disse que o senador João Alberto (PMDB) afirmou, "aos berros", que "sou Satanás". "E agora fazem panfletos apócrifos em que sou representado pelo Diabo", disse. "Espalham mentiras contra meu pai, um idoso de 82 anos, aposentado e hipertenso. Essa "gente" é liderada pelo senador Jose Sarney. Querem, assim, conduzir a campanha ao esgoto absoluto, me levar ao nível deles, que nada tem a dizer ou propor. Eles não sabem que quem tem fé, de verdade, e põe a sua vida a serviço da causa da justiça, não tem medo de nada, nem de ninguém", completou.

George Gallaway: Why doesn´t Israel have the right of occupy Palestine?

Judeus ortodoxos contra o sionismo e Israel nos EUA - Vale a pena ver - English e Português - Vídeo

Incrível esse vídeo. Um judeu ortodoxo denunciando o sionismo de modo brilhante, porque o sionismo é uma grande desgraça, uma forma de racismo, apartheid e de genocídio. O materialismo que ele critica não é o filosófico, mas o apego - muito comum essa transposição. Vale muito a pena ver. Ser judeu não é o mesmo que ser sionista e compactuar com esse crime que é uma prática nazista por parte dos sionistas.

Alli Sotak, Palestinian Poet: We teach Life, Sir!

Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down Malaysian Airlines MH17. It was Not a ‘Buk’ Surface to Air Missile

Evidence Is Now Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down Malaysian Airlines MH17. It was Not a ‘Buk’ Surface to Air Missile

We’ll go considerably farther than has yet been revealed by the
professional intelligence community, to provide the actual evidence that
conclusively shows that (and how) the Ukrainian Government shot down
the Malaysian airliner, MH-17, on July 17th.

The latest report from the intelligence community was headlined on August 3rd by Robert Parry, “Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts,” and he revealed there that,

“Contrary to the Obama administration’s public claims
blaming eastern Ukrainian rebels and Russia for the shoot-down
of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, some U.S. intelligence analysts have
concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault and that
it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame, according to a
source briefed on these findings. This judgment — at odds with what
President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have expressed
publicly — is based largely on the absence of U.S. government
evidence that Russia supplied the rebels with a Buk anti-aircraft
missile system that would be needed to hit a civilian jetliner flying
at 33,000 feet, said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.”

It’s actually based on lots
more than that; it’s based not on an absence of evidence, but on
positive proof that the Ukrainian Government shot the plane down, and
even proving how it was done. You will see this proof, right here, laid
out in detail, for the first time.

The reader-comments to my July 31st article, “First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down,” provided
links and leads to independent additional confirmatory evidence backing
up that account, of retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Haisenko’s
reconstruction of this event, to such an extent that, after exploring
the matter further, I now feel confident enough to say that the evidence
on this matter is, indeed, “conclusive,” that Haisenko is right.

Here is all of that evidence, which collectively convinces me that Haisenko’s conclusion there, is, indeed, the only one that can even possibly explain this wreckage:

“There have been two or three
pieces of fuselage that have been really pockmarked with what almost
looks like machine-gun fire, very very strong machine-gun fire.”

This remarkable statement comes not from Haisenko, but from one of
the first OSCE investigators who arrived at the scene of the disaster.


Go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ze9BNGDyk4 and you will see it.

That youtube snippet in an interview with Michael Bociurkiw, comes from a man who is

“a Ukrainian-Canadian monitor with the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), [who] has seen up close … the
crash site of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17. Bociurkiw and one other
colleague were the first international monitors to reach the
wreckage after the jet was shot down over a rebel-held region of eastern
Ukraine July 17.”

That description of him is from the lead-in to the full interview with him, at the 29 July 2014 CBC news article, “Malaysia Airlines MH17: Michael Bociurkiw talks about being first at the crash site.” The
far briefer youtube clip shows only what’s presented on 6:10-6:24 of
this CBC interview with Bociurkiw. The CBC reporter in the video
precedes the interview by announcing, “The wreckage was still smoldering
when a small team from the OSCE got there.” So: he had to have been
there really fast. “No other officials arrived for days,” she said.

So: one of the two first
international monitors on-site saw conclusive evidence that the
Malaysian plane had been hit by “very very strong machine-gun fire,” not
by ground-based missile-fire.

Peter Haisenko’s reconstruction of the downing of that airliner, was here being essentially confirmed on-site by one of the two first OSCE international monitors to arrive on-site, while the wreckage was still smoldering.
That’s as close to virgin, untouched evidence and testimony as we’ll
ever get. Unlike a black-box interpretation-analysis long afterward by
the Russian Government, or by the British Government, or by the
Ukrainian Government, each of which governments has a horse in this
race, this testimony from Bociurkiw is raw, independent, and comes from
one of the two earliest witnesses to the physical evidence. That’s
powerfully authoritative testimony, and it happens to confirm pilot
Peter Haisenko’s theory of what happened. Bociurkiw arrived there fast
because he negotiated with the locals for the rest of the OSCE team, who
were organizing to come later: Bociurkiw speaks the local languages
there — Ukrainian and Russian.

Furthermore, this is hardly
testimony from someone who is supportive of the anti-Government rebels.
Earlier, there had been this, http://pressimus.com/Interpreter_Mag/press/3492,
which transcribed the BBC’s interview with Bociurkiw on July 22nd. He
said then: “We’re observing that major pieces, and I’m looking at the
tail fin as I said, and then there’s also the rear cone section of the
aircraft, they do look different than when we first saw them, … two days
ago.” So, he had arrived on-scene July 20th at the latest. (Neither the
BBC nor the CBC, both of which interviewed him, were sufficiently
professional to have reported the specific date at which Bociurkiw had
actually arrived on-scene, but, from this, it couldn’t have been after
July 20th. The downing had occurred July 17th. If some of the debris was
still “smoldering” as the CBC journalist said, then maybe he had
arrived there even earlier.)

The youtube snippet of Bociurkiw came to me via a reader-comment to
my article, from Bill Johnson, after which I web-searched the youtube
clip for its source and arrived then at the 29 July 2014 CBC news
article and its accompanying video.

Further, there’s this crucial 21 July photo-reconstruction of that cockpit-fragment positioned into place on the aircraft as it had originally been in that intact-airliner:  https://twitter.com/EzraBraam. (Sometimes that doesn’t work, so here’s another screen of it from someone who copied it.)
Looking at that photo-reconstruction, one can easily tell that the
SU-25 or other fighter-jet that was firing into the cockpit from the
pilot’s left side didn’t just riddle the area surrounding the pilot with
bullets, but that it then targeted-in specifically onto the pilot
himself, producing at his location a huge gaping hole in the side of the
plane precisely at the place where the pilot was seated. Furthermore,
this gaping hole was produced by shooting into the plane, precisely at
the pilot, from below and to the pilot’s left, which is where that
fighter-jet was located — not from above the airliner, and not from
beside it, and also not from below it.

In other words: this was
precise and closely-targeted firing against the pilot himself, not a
blast directed broadly against, and aiming to hit, the plane anywhere,
to bring it down.

Haisenko explained how this penetration of the plane, though it was
targeted specifically at the pilot, caused immediately a breaking-apart
of the entire aircraft.

Other readers have responded to my news-report about Haisenko’s article,
by saying that shrapnel from a Buk missile could similarly have caused
those holes into the side of the cockpit. However, that objection
ignores another key feature of Haisenko’s analysis. Haisenko said there:
“You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the
holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean,
showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter
caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly
frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same
caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that … these exit holes of
the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded
or bent — outwardly!”

What this means is that in
order to have some of those holes frayed inwardly and the other holes
frayed outwardly, there had to have been a second fighter-jet firing
into the cockpit from the airliner’s right-hand side.

That’s critically important, because no ground-based missile (or
shrapnel therefrom) hitting the airliner could possibly have produced
firing into the cockpit from both  sides of the plane. It had
to have been a hail of bullets from both sides, that brought the plane
down, in that circumstance. This is Haisenko’s main discovery, by his
pointing that out. You can’t have projectiles going in both directions —
into the left-hand-side fuselage panel from both its left and right
sides — unless they are coming at the panel from different directions.
Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped
through that panel from both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out any  ground-fired missile.

Peter Haisenko posted an
extremely high-resolution image from that photo which he used, and it
shows unequivocally that some of the bullet-holes were inbound while
others of them were outbound: Here it is, viewed very close-up.

Although the fighter jets that
were said to have been escorting the Malaysian plane into the war-zone
were alleged to be SU-25 planes, a different type might have been used.
SU-25s are designed to be flown up to 23,000 feet without an
oxygen-mask, but can go much higher if the pilot does wear that mask,
which was probably the case here. Of course, an airliner itself is fully
pressurized. That pressurization inside the airliner is, moreover, a
key part of Haisenko’s reconstruction of this airliner’s downing.
Basically, Haisenko reconstructs the airliner’s breaking apart as soon
as that hail of bullets opened and released the plane’s pressurization.

The specific photo of that
cockpit-fragment, which Haisenko had downloaded immediately after the
disaster, was removed from the Internet, but other photos of this
fragment were posted elsewhere, such as at the British publication
(which, like the rest of the Western “news” media is slanted pro-Obama,
anti-Putin), on July 21st, headlining their anti-Putin missile-theory
bias, “MH17 crash: FT photo shows signs of damage from missile strike.” Their “reporters” opened with their blatant anti-Russian prejudice:

“The first apparent hard evidence that Malaysia Airlines
Flight MH17 was brought down by a surface-to-air missile is emerging
from the crash site in eastern Ukraine, after experts confirmed on
Monday there were signs of shrapnel damage to the aircraft.”

Although they didn’t say in their opener that the “surface-to-air
missile” was from the rebels, they made clear their
pro-Ukrainian-Government anti-Russian bias by saying, “Over the weekend,
western intelligence agencies pointed to mounting evidence that backs
Ukraine’s claim that the aircraft with 298 people on board was shot down
by mistake by pro-Russian separatists and Russian military personnel
with an SA-11 missile launched from a Buk-M1 SAM battery.” Their
stenographers (or as they would say “reporters”) stenographed
(“reported”) that, “Douglas Barrie of the International Institute for
Strategic Studies, said the photographic evidence ‘was consistent with
the kind of damage you would expect to see from the detonation of a high
explosive fragmentation warhead of the type commonly used in a SAM
system’.” No analyst from the pro-Putin camp  was interviewed by their “reporters.” For example, Russia’s Interfax News Service headlined on July 29th, the same day as the FT’s  article, “Boeing’s downing by Buk missile system unlikely — military expert,” and they stenographed their  “expert,” as follows:

Chief
of the Russian Land Forces’ tactical air defense troops Maj. Gen.
Mikhail Krush said he doubts that the Malaysian passenger liner was
brought down by a Buk surface-to-air missile system. “No one observed a
Buk engaging targets in that region on that day, which provides 95
percent proof that Buk systems were not used in this concrete case,” the
general said in an interview with the Voyenno-Promyshlenny Kuryer
military weekly to be published on Wednesday [July 30th]. ”This is no
more than a theory for now. However, a guided missile launched by a Buk
missile system leaves behind a specific smoke trail as it flies, like a
comet. In daylight this trail can be clearly seen within a radius of
20-25 kilometers from the missile system. It cannot remain unnoticed.
There are no eyewitnesses to confirm there was any. No one reported a
launch. This is one thing,” he said. “Second. The holes left by the
strike elements on the Boeing’s outer skin indicate that the warhead
blew up from below and sideways. A Buk missile strikes the target from
above,” he said. “The damage done to the plane suggests that a different
missile was used. Our guidance method is a zoom, when the missile
strikes the target from above covering it with a thick cloud of
fragments” the general said. “I cannot state categorically, guided by
this data, but I can suggest, using my experience, that it was not a Buk
missile that hit the Boeing,” the expert said.

General Krush’s statement can fit with Haisenko’s and with Bociurkiw’s, but not with FT’s  or the rest of the “reporters” (just consider them as rank propagandists) in the West.

U.S. President Barack Obama has been saying all along that Russia – against which he is actually systematically building toward war – and not Ukraine (which he’s using as his chief vehicle to do that),
is to blame for this airliner-downing. Previously, he had said that the
snipers who in February had killed many people at the Maidan
demonstrations against the pro-Russian Ukrainian President Viktor
Yanukovych came from Yanukovych’s State Security Service and not from
the far-right political parties that were trying to bring Yanukovych
down and that Obama’s agent Victoria Nuland selected to run the new
Ukrainian government. But that too was an Obama lie. He lies a lot, and it’s just about the only type of statement he ever makes about Russia, and about Ukraine: lies.

If someone wants to verify how
rabidly the U.S. Government lies, and has lied since at least the time
of George W. Bush’s Presidency, just look at this video, by starting at 16:00 on it and going to 42:00 on it,
and you will be shocked. (It pertains to lies by Bush that are still
being covered up by Obama.) And when you further consider the many
obvious questions it points out, which U.S. “news” media refused to ask
and still refuse to ask about the matter, you’ll recognize that we are
being lied to systematically and with utter contempt of the public, and
with no respect for the public’s right to know the truth, even regarding
massive history like that. It’s really brutal.

Ignorant “reporters” sometimes
slip-up and include, in their stenography, facts that actually support
the opposite side’s narrative of events and that discredit their own
story-line. Such has been the case, for example, in the Financial Times 
piece, which included the statement that, “Anti-aircraft missiles are
not designed to score a direct hit as they are targeted to destroy fast,
agile fighter jets. Instead, they are designed to explode within about
20m of their target, sending out a cloud of red hot metal to increase
the chances of inflicting as much damage as possible.”

But rather than merely “a cloud
of red hot metal,” what actually brought down this plane was what
Haisenko has said brought it down: magazines-full of carefully targeted
rapid-fire machine-gun bullets pouring forth from below the plane, at
both its left and right.

This was a Ukrainian Government job. It was close-in.
(No missile fired from the distance more than 30,000 feet down to the
ground could have been that precise to target the pilot rather than the
far larger target of the plane’s entire body.) It came from the Government that Obama installed there in February and that’s now carrying out an ethnic-cleansing campaign against the residents in Ukraine’s southeast, the places where Yanukovych’s voters live (to the extent that they still can and do live).Compare that picture with the following one, which I take from a propaganda-site for the U.S. regime,
and so which is intended instead to support the Administration’s line
on this, certainly not Haisenko’s explanation of how the airliner was
downed, though it actually supports Haisenko’s case:

As you can see there, a plane that’s hit by a ground-fired
missile, instead of by bullets fired from an attack-plane only a few
yards away, has the damage spread rather widely over its body, not
concentrated into a tiny area, such as to where the plane’s pilot is
seated. Certainly, the contrast between that photo and this one is enormous.

Furthermore, note also that the
shrapnel damage to that plane comes from above it, which is where
missiles usually hit a plane from, releasing their shrapnel from above,
down onto the plane. By contrast, the hail of bullets to the Malaysian
plane’s pilot came from below the plane, aiming upward at the cockpit,
from both sides of the cockpit.

As regards whether there were
actually two fighter jets firing into the Malaysian airliner or only
one, a proponent of the single-jet hypothesis, Bill Johnson, posted as a
reader-comment to my article on August 4th,
a series of extreme close-ups of the side-panel, in which he inferred
that the explanation of the apparent left-side (pilot-side) bullets was
probably the shape of the bullets. I then asked him why he declined to
accept the possible existence of two jets. He said,

“from what I could find Russian military radar detected
only one Ukrainian fighter jet, not two. I have looked and looked for
any type of radar confirmation of a second fighter jet and can not find
it.”

However, the most virginal, earliest, online evidence concerning the
matter was on July 17th, within moments of the downing, headlined in the
subsequent English translation, “Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17,” and
it included, “@spainbuca’s TWITTER FEED,” which included his
observation, only minutes after the downing, “2 jet fighters flew very
close” to the plane. Furthermore, immediately before that, he had
tweeted, “The B777 plane flew escorted by Ukraine jet fighter until 2
minutes before disappearing from the radar.” So, perhaps the second jet
appeared distinct to him only immediately prior to the downing.


The accompanying news-report, also on July 17th, said:

“This Kiev air traffic
controller is a citizen of Spain and was working in the Ukraine. He was
taken off duty as a civil air-traffic controller along with other
foreigners immediately after a Malaysia Airlines passenger aircraft was
shot down over the Eastern Ukraine killing 295 passengers and crew on
board. The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation
and basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military
was behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated
after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down.” If this is true,
then the radar-records upon the basis of which those tweets had been
sent were “confiscated.”

The best evidence is consistent
that those bullet-holes came from two directions not from one. What is
virtually certain, however, is that at least one jet fighter was close
up and shot down the Malaysian plane. The rest of the tweets from
@spainbucca, there, described the immediate hostility of the Kiev
authorities toward him on the occasion, and his speculations as to who
was behind it all.

And the European Union has been playing along with this hoax.
(If you still have any further doubts that it’s a hoax, just click onto
that link and look.) And the mass of suckers in the West believe that hoax:
it’s succeeding to stir a fever for war, instead of a fever to get rid
of our own leaders who are lying us into a war that will benefit only
the West’s aristocrats, while it inflicts massive physical and economic
harms against everyone else – as if it were the invasion of Iraq except
multiplied in this case a thousand-fold, especially with nuclear weapons
possibly at the end of it.

If we had a free press, the
news media would be ceaselessly asking President Obama why he doesn’t
demand accountability against the Ukrainian Government for their massacre perpetrated on May 2nd inside the Trade Unions Building in Odessa, where that newly Obama-installed regime’s
peaceful opponents were systematically trapped and then burned alive,
which the Obama-installed Ukrainian Government has refused to
investigate (much less to prosecute). Basically: Obama had sponsored the massacre. So, our “news” media ignore it, even though it started this civil war on Russia’s doorstep, and thereby re-started the Cold War, as Obama had intended that massacre (his  massacre, and his  subsequent
ethnic cleansing) to do. (Similarly, the “news” media, though all of
them receive my articles by email, virtually all refuse to publish them,
because I won’t let them control what I find and report.)

And while Obama leads this Republican policy,
and Vice President Dick Cheney’s top foreign-policy advisor Victoria
Nuland actually runs it for Obama, congressional Democrats are just
silent about it, and do not introduce impeachment of this fake “Democratic” hyper-George W. Bush neo-conservative President, who’s a “Democrat” in rhetoric only – and though Obama’s policy in this key matter threatens the entire world.

A reader-comment to an earlier
version of this news report and analysis objected to my identifying
Obama as a Republican-in-”Democratic”-sheep’s clothing, and said:

“They may be rethug policies in origin but they are
decidedly BI-PARTISAN to anyone who wants to admit FACTS. The democratic
party you all think still exists is DEAD and only exists in your brain
(the part that doesn’t accept reality).”

However, U.S. Senate bill 2277, which invites Obama to provide direct
U.S. military support to the Obama-installed Ukrainian regime, has 26
sponsors, and all of them are Republican U.S. Senators. Democratic
Senators, by contrast, are just silent on Obama’s turn toward nazism (or
racist — in this case anti-ethnic-Russian racist –  fascism); the
Senate’s Democrats aren’t seeking for it to be stepped up.


This is a Republican policy, which congressional Democrats are simply
afraid to oppose. Any realistic person knows that however far right
Obama turns, the overt  Republican Party will turn even farther
to the right, because they have to be to his right in order for them to
be able to win Republican primaries and retain their own  Party’s
nomination. Just because Obama’s game of moving the American political
center as far to the right as he can move it is succeeding, doesn’t mean
that the Democratic Party itself should end. It instead means that
progressives need to take the Democratic Party over, just like
conservatives took the Republican Party over with Reagan. There is no
other hope.


If a Democrat in the U.S. House will simply introduce an impeachment
resolution against Barack Obama, then the right-wing takeover of the
Democratic Party might finally end, and the world might yet be saved,
because the Democratic Party itself could then reject Obama as being a
fake “Democrat,” a Democrat-in-rhetoric-only. It could transform
American politics — and American politics needs such a transformation,
which would move the Democratic Party back to progressivism, more like
the FDR Democratic Party was, so that Republican politicians would no
longer need to be so fascist as they now have become (and as they now
need to be  in order to be able to win their own  Party’s
nomination). If Democrats fail to renounce the conservatism of Obama
and of the Clintons, then the Party will end, and needs to be replaced,
just like the Republican Party replaced the Whig Party immediately
before the Civil War. Nazism has become today’s slavery-type issue –
it’s beyond the pale, and Obama’s installation and endorsement of it in
Ukraine is like James Buchanan’s endorsement of slavery was during the
1850s: either the Democratic Party will become the progressive party, or
else the Democratic Party is over.

But that’s just my own theory
of how Obama’s frauds might yet be able to be overcome and defeated, if
they still can be; it’s not part of my presentation of the explanation
of what brought down the Malaysian airliner, which has been an open case
since July 17th, and which is now a closed case. This is past history,
not future.

The present news story is being
circulated free of charge or copyright to all “news” media in the
English-speaking world, in the perhaps vain hope that the cover-ups of
our leaders’ constant lies will cease soon enough to avoid a World War
III, even though communism is long since gone from Russia and so the
ideological excuse wouldn’t make any sense here.

This insanity is actually all about aristocratic conquest, like World War I was. It’s not for the benefit of the public anywhere. Silence
about it (by “Democrats,” and the “news” media) is a scandal, which
needs to stop. The real Democratic Party (the Party of FDR, who loathed
and despised nazis — and even mere fascists — yet today Obama installs
nazis into Power in Ukraine) must be restored, and a real news media
needs to become established in America. Even Republicans need it,
because the very idea of “victory” in a nuclear war is a vicious fantasy. It is a dangerous lie, though there are some people who find it a very profitable one. And time might be short — let’s hope not already too  short.

After all, Obama’s hoax of
having won from Europe the stepped-up economic sanctions against Russia
after the government that Obama had installed in Ukraine downed the
Malaysian plane and successfully blamed it on “Russian aggression,” is
very encouraging to him. And European leaders know that Obama’s entire operation is a very bloody fraud (read the phone-transcript there — it’s a stunner). So, they certainly won’t save the world from it. It’s up to us.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.